The following related content has been included below due to its relevance to this topic area. Please see the Navigation Bar on the right for tools and resources that are specific to this Knowledge Pathway.
Q: Does continuous administration of enteral nutrition compared with intermittent or bolus feeding result in better outcomes in critically ill adults?
Q: Does enteral feeding into the small intestine (post-pyloric) compared to gastric feeding result in improved outcomes in critically ill adults?
Q: What strategies are effective to optimize delivery of enteral nutrition and minimize risks in critically ill adults (e.g. feeding protocols, motility agents, positioning)?
Q: Does early enteral nutrition (initiating feeding within 48 hours of admission to ICU) versus delayed enteral nutrition (initiated within 48 to 96 hours of admission) result in improved outcomes in critically ill adults?
Q: How does blenderized tube feeding compare to commercial enteral formula in adults and children?
The following Practice Questions are part of another Knowledge Pathway. These questions have been included in the Related Questions section of this Knowledge Pathway due to their relevancy to this topic area. Click on the practice question to view the synthesis of the literature and the practice guidance or recommendations.
Q: Does immunonutrient supplementation improve patient outcomes in critically ill adults?
A synthesis of the recommendations and evidence regarding nutrition support.
Target Audience: Professional